Matt W. Barrow wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...
news.verizon.net wrote:
and in those same articles it mentions that some of the prisoners don't
want to go back to their country of origin due to fear for their lives
and some of the countries don't want them back either. but I guess that
does not fit with your argument so you ignore those facts.
The argument, since you clearly have the attention span of a gnat with
ADD, is over the claim that every single person imprisoned at Guantanamo
is a terrorist or guilty of some sort of violent action against the U.S.
Those articles clearly refute that, as do the actions of the Pentagon in
offering them release whether or not they have some place to go. Several
years late, mind you...

You better check your own attention span since you're conflating "cleared
for release" with the circumstances of theri capture.

Oh, so now you're saying the Pentagon is irresponsibly releasing
clearing them for release?

In case you haven't heard, several sent back from Gitmo have been captured
again or killed in attacks against us.

Cites, please. And even if true, might it not be the case that being
held for years under the conditions imposed would be even to **** anyone
off enough to take up arms?

By the way, are you now taking up the cause of China in calling the 22
Uighur secessionists terrorists?

Head out of ass, please.

You first.