Thread: No F'in way!
View Single Post
  #5  
Old January 15th 08, 05:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
William Hung[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 349
Default No F'in way!

On Jan 15, 12:51*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
William Hung wrote :





On Jan 15, 12:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
C J Campbell wrote
innews:20080114211912

8930-christophercampbell@hotmailcom:


On 2008-01-05 17:14:27 -0800, Bertie the Bunyip said:


wrote in
news:4eea4f10-6477-4bd1-9c65-2ba15326c916
@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com:


Still flies better than you ever will.


Bertie


Heh.


With a reasonable headwind a Zenith CH701 could do it.


Yeah, I think it could even do it zero wind, eh?
One of those Slepcev Storchs could definitely do it.


Bertie


A Storch is almost a helicopter. It would be a lot of fun to build
and fly one.


I know someone who is building the Pazmany version.Most guys are
doing the Slepcev version which is much simpler. It's 3/4 scale and
it;s still huge! Unbelievably complicated too. They had to make their
own landing gear oleos, for instance. and the slat system is
unbelievable. Make a great airplane when it's done. Too bad it will
have a Lycoming and not an Argus or some other V8


Bertie- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


The Storchs do look more hefty than the Zeniths, but I wonder how
their actual performance compares. *I have seen many videos of the 701
fly (incredible). *I haven't yet seen a video of the Storchs fly,
although I've read many write ups.


I saw one fly once a few years ago. It got up and went alright. I'm sure
you could run next to it in even a mild breeze.
I'd go for a Storch just cause of what it is, but if I wanted a
workhorse, i'd probably go for the Zenith. I think it's a lot cheaper,
too.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


and a lot easier to built from what I have read. More likely for a
fella to get into the air sooner. No pun intended.

Wil