WingFlaps wrote in
:

On Jan 14, 9:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
WingFlaps wrote
innews:ab075785-35a1-4c24-b0c6-950b2
:



On Jan 14, 2:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
WingFlaps wrote
innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-a19b8
:

On Jan 10, 5:07*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

wrote in
news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
:

On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" wrote:
BradGuthwrote:

Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
everything NASA,

Apollo, moon landing and hoax worthy as fast as they
can?

Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead
loads of
smut
crapolla?

Is there a little something to worry about, especially
since thus
far
JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf
of anything

NASA/Apollo?

Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax"
together: "(Venus
is
ahoax.)"

I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology
that's hard at

work.

- Brad Guth

That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.

MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage
units or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon
most everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their
having lost track of all 700 of those essential NASA/Apollo
boxes of audio, video and endless streams of their mission
critical and science data. * Gee whiz, no wonder our
government can so continually lie, deny and manage to get
away with it, just like it did for so long over the USS
LIBERTY fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight 800,
9/11 and the Iraq war

that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can
manage to provoke the living crapolla out of those other
mostly innocent Muslims.

I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.

Wow, that was almost coherent.

Almost.

Bertie

BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything
NASA/Apollo?

It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright
enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically
dark and electrostatic dusty moon.

Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather
nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even
if given in full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish
as most everything should. *Guess our moon landings were simply
too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've
been informed. - Brad Guth

Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed by
apollo missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting
telescope. But that would get in the way of you conspiracy
fantasy so I'll not expand on them.

6574178373

Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.

Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a dust
'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the lander engines
(I can't remember which mission tho' but the picture is in the
public domain). While the lander(s) is(are) too small to be seen
directly, the fact that these objects are where they should be
seems to add a lot of credence to the idea that the missions took
place. Add that to the photographs and samples and it's not looking
good for the conspiracy theorists. As for the moon not being mostly
gray, you just have to look at it... *I've carried out image
processing on my moon pictures and the saturation of the colors is
not zero but very close to it so you have to boost color contrast a
lot to see hues in the gray surface..

Oh yeah. I didn't reckon you could see them with binoculars!

I need no evidence whatsoever to "believe" in the lunar landings.
What they did is easier than a cover up would be anyway... I haven't
got the patience to address the same BS issues like the shadows, the
gamma radiation the breeze in the flag and all that. it doesn't
matter to them how well you explain it, they keep coming back for
more.


Hey Bertie what do you think about this:

http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15
_touchdown_photos
_010427.html

Now I wonder how they thought to fake that? I wonder, can a flounder's
brain explode or will it implode?

That's cool. I'd sell any part of my body to have done that.

Bertie