"Dan Luke" wrote in
:

Perhaps you meant, "scientific faith and religious conviction."

No. I am attempting to entice you into making a definitive statement
explaining what your point is.

Up to now, you've provided word salad and evasions.

It seems you realize you don't know what you're talking about WRT
science and belief. Looks like you're resorting to being coy so you
won't be caught out.

But I could be wrong. Perhaps you really do have a cogent idea discuss.
Seems unlikely, but why don't you try again?

Take your time. I can wait.

For your benefit, I posted a more detailed explanation of my opinion in
another post.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...0a667960c4fe6f