Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
On Feb 8, 1:11?pm, Dallas wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:42:18 -0600, Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
They are quite effective else all the DUI convictions would have been thrown out.

Wikipedia seems to indicate that breathalyzers are prone to significant
error. ?One might be smart to demand a blood test instead.



Wikipedia IS prone to significant error.


From Wikipedia:
SNIP

Gee, doesn't it amaze you that all of the DUI lawyers out there
haven't found this info and jumped all over it?

They already have.

Why do you think there won't be anyone prosecuted based solely on a
borderline breathalyzer test?

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.