Clark wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote in
:
:
: Clark wrote:
:
::"Paul J. Adam" wrote in
:
::
:: In message , Clark
:: writes
::On 09 Feb 2008, you wrote in rec.aviation.military.naval:
:: In message , Clark
:: writes
::Show me a VLS system other than submarine that isn't used with Aegis.
::
:: GWS26 Sea Wolf. PAAMS (Sylver launchers plus ASTER missiles). SA-N-6 and
:: SA-N-9, for the Russians. At least one Chinese system whose designation
:: I can't recall offhand. Barak, for Israeli kit. Vertically Launched Sea
:: Sparrow.
::
:: There may be more but that's a starting point. Plenty of users like
:: vertical launch without ever getting near AEGIS.
::
::
::In other words, for the point of this exchange there aren't any. We were
::typing about Standard missiles.
::
:: No, you weren't - unless you can show me a submarine firing Standards...
::
::What? All I have mentioned is Standards. I specifically excluded submarine
::VLS. Are you having a bad day?
::
:
: And why would you do that if you were only referring to Standards,
: which any fool knows are not fired from submarines?
:
:Because I know that you are a fool.

And yet you're the one saying all the egregiously stupid things.

::
::
:: Even letting that pass, turn your eyes to the Canadian Tribal-class
:: destroyers, and their Mark 41 VLS systems, the Standard missiles
:: therein, and their remarkable lack of AEGIS. Or the Australian Adelaides
:: after their VLS modification, ditto. Or the German Sachsens....
::
:: Plenty of VLS systems launching Standard that still have no AEGIS
:: involved on the ship.
::
::
::And none of them US. Fine. There are other non-US Standard VLS systems
::without Aegis. Are there are any US VLS systems without Aegis?
::
:
: Yes. I already told you that.
:
:
:No you didn't. You went off on tangents.

Yes, I did. Your inability to read is YOUR problem.

And your problem is obvious...


--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson