Lack of content noted.
Poor Clarkie has been way too stupid for way to long.
Take a 30 day 'time out' sonny.
plonk
Clark wrote:
:Fred J. McCall wrote in
:
:
: Clark wrote:
:
::Fred J. McCall wrote in
:
::
:: Clark wrote:
::
:::Fred J. McCall wrote in
om:
:::
::: Clark wrote:
:::
::::On 09 Feb 2008, you wrote in rec.aviation.military.naval:
::::
:::: In message , Clark
:::: writes
::::Show me a VLS system other than submarine that isn't used with
::::Aegis.
::::
:::: GWS26 Sea Wolf. PAAMS (Sylver launchers plus ASTER missiles).
:::: SA-N-6 and SA-N-9, for the Russians. At least one Chinese system
:::: whose designation I can't recall offhand. Barak, for Israeli kit.
:::: Vertically Launched Sea Sparrow.
::::
:::: There may be more but that's a starting point. Plenty of users
:::: like vertical launch without ever getting near AEGIS.
::::
::::
::::In other words, for the point of this exchange there aren't any. We
::::were typing about Standard missiles.
::::
:::
::: No, we weren't. You insisted that "AEGIS" was identically "VLS".
:::
:::Read it again dimwit. I noted that Aegis and vls went together and
:::they do.
:::
::
:: Read it again, dumbass. You insisted that "AEGIS" and "VLS" meant the
:: same thing. They don't. They also don't always go together. There
:: have been AEGIS ships without VLS and VLS ships without AEGIS.
::
:::
:::
::: You're wrong. It's not.
:::
:::Show me an Aegis that doesn't have VLS.
:::
::: That's not even true for Standard-capable launchers (Mk 41 VLS),
::: since the new LPDs will have Mk 41 launchers and no AEGIS system.
::: Some of the Spruance class (all those currently left in commission)
::: have Mk 41 VLS and no AEGIS system.
:::
:::There are no Sprucans left in commission. Last one was decommissioned
:::in 05.
:::
::
:: So what? You claimed there was no VLS without AEGIS. You then
:: revised to there being no VLS firing Standard without AEGIS (and vice
:: versa).
::
::And you tried to use Sprucans as an example of VLS w/o Aegis. So sorry
::that they don't exist.
::
:
: Except they do exist. You're just now trying to further revise your
: original remark to achieve some form of correctness. So far:
:
: 1) You claimed there was no VLS without AEGIS and vice versa, saying
: that saying AEGIS when you meant VLS was the same statement.
:
: 2) You then revised to there being no VLS capable of firing Standard
: without AEGIS (and vice versa).
:
: 3) You then revised to there being no *US* VLS capable of firing
: Standard without AEGIS (and vice versa).
:
: 4) You're now at there being no *US* VLS on ships currently in
: commission capable of firing Standard without AEGIS (and vice versa).
:
: And you're still wrong.
:
:Nope. You've got it wrong boy. You try to twist the words but they just
:don't work. Sorry 'bout that.
:
::
::
:: You're still wrong. There have been AEGIS ships without VLS and there
:: have been VLS ships, firing both Standard and other missiles, without
:: AEGIS.
::
::That wasn't what I stated. Go back and read it again. Get someone to
::help you understand.
::
:
: That was precisely what you stated and your ill-mannered behaviour at
: this point doesn't erase it. Let us once again enumerate the
: evolution of your claim:
:
: 1) You claimed there was no VLS without AEGIS and vice versa, saying
: that saying AEGIS when you meant VLS was the same statement.
:
:Nope. Sure didn't. Go back and read it again. Get some help to understand
:the big words. Try hard.
:
: 2) You then revised to there being no VLS capable of firing Standard
: without AEGIS (and vice versa).
:
: 3) You then revised to there being no *US* VLS capable of firing
: Standard without AEGIS (and vice versa).
:
: 4) You're now at there being no *US* VLS on ships currently in
: commission capable of firing Standard without AEGIS (and vice versa).
:
: And you're still wrong.
:
:Nope. You've got it wrong boy. You try to twist the words but they just
:don't work. Sorry 'bout that.
:
::
::
:::
::: Now, would you like to wriggle some more, or shall you just admit
::: you didn't know what you were talking about and move on?
:::
:::Get real. You are the arrogant clueless one here. You really need a
:::reality check...and some parental guidance.
:::
::
:: Both my parents are dead, you stupid ****e. My mother just died a few
:: weeks ago.
::
:: And you're not only ignorant and stupid, you're apparently also
:: ill-mannered and insensitive.
::
::And I'm insensitive because of....what? Now, if you had previously
:
ublished that your mother had passed on and it was known to all then
:
erhaps I would be insensitive.
::
:
: Uh, I don't know how to break it to you, dumbass, but that's precisely
: what happened. Ask around.
:
:Nope. Didn't happen. You're making more false claims just like your
:reference to Spruances. Sorry boy but you're busted on this one. Move on.
:
: As we've seen from your other expositions in ignorance, YOU not
: knowing is not the same as "not known to all".
:
::
::Your bull**** on the other hand is highly
::suspect because you've already made other *documented* false statements
:
see Sprucans).
::
:
: And just what did I say that was false? Have you now moved to "the
: Spruance class never existed" in your litany of idiocy?
:
:Have you forgotten that you used the Sprucans as a reference even though
:they are long gone?
:
::
::In other words, your mother didn't just pass and you are
::trying for the sympathy play. Good luck with that.
::
:
: Why would anyone want 'sympathy' from a gormless twit like you? And
: do you seriously think anyone would bother to tell such a lie just to
: 'win' a point? Unlikely. After all, most people aren't like you.
:
::
::
:: Sort of a Renaissance ****head.
::
::Well, the ****head part describes you perfectly. Try real hard to deal
::with the world as it exists rather than the one you want to spin. Good
::luck!
::
:
: Yeah. Now that's you've achieved maximal stupidity, you should
: probably run away.
:
:Any you shouldn't even have posted in the first place parrot boy. It's time
:for you to admit your errors Freddie. Give up now and perhaps you will be
:forgiven. Otherwise, drown in you own bull****. HTH & HAND.
:
s. maybe his grandmother will die next...