View Single Post
  #7  
Old February 17th 08, 09:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,969
Default About Stall Psychology and Pilots

"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in news:fdb73a60-ea0c-
:

On Feb 17, 12:39 pm, wrote:
On Feb 17, 9:44 am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:

Well, that's true. Are we supposed to put AoA meters
on all control surfaces, such as Elevators, Ailerons,
Rudder, Flaps or just the main wing?
Dud, have you ever heard of a *stall warning audio
annunciator*?
In sims I've installed an AoA meter, it's basically
an aerodynamic curiousity.


In a sim it's not aerodynamic. It's an electronic illusion.
And it won't mean much to the simmer who has little understanding of
AOA, never mind boundary layer control, stagnation points, stalls,
accelerated stalls, stall progression, leading edge radii, and the
like. BTW, "curiousity" is spelled "curiosity." And the "main wing"

is
known among real pilots simply as the "wing."


" We don't need AOA indicators on control surfaces. "

Well Dan, try telling that to the "dud".
He's the genoius who want's them deployed
all over you body, sounds like a govmonker
trying to tell REAL pilots how to fly.
Like I said, most of the posters in this group
have never flown, I can tell, "dud", "bertie"
and a few others are total fakes.


Yeah, it's obvious isn't it?




Nothing wrong with siming a low altidude recovery,
dude. It's cheaper to crash and burn in a sim than
to ****-up reallllllllly.


Go to it trailer trash!

Bertie