Thread
:
Post-Annual Flight
View Single Post
#
6
February 22nd 08, 01:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.owning
Peter Clark
external usenet poster
Posts: 538
Post-Annual Flight
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:01:25 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Feb 21, 7:13*pm, Peter Clark
wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:27:27 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote:
Apparently having three other fuel tanks to choose from makes a single
tank's fuel gauge "non-required"...
Not if the regulation says *EACH* tank guage. *Does your equipment
list have R, S, or O *next to the guage for the tank?
As far as I know, typical small personal planes don't even have
approved MELs. But even if the PA-28-325 had one, the wording of
91.213a only allows an MEL to impose ADDITIONAL requirements for
airworthiness; an MEL doen't override the basic reqirements of 91.205.
(When a regulation says "You can't do X unless Y", that doesn't mean
that Y is the ONLY requirement you have to meet. For example, if a
regulation says "You can't be PIC unless you have a current medical
certificate", that doesn't mean that medical certification is the ONLY
requirement for being PIC; rather, all requirements stated elsewhere
are still in force as well.)
An equipment list is different from a MEL. Cessna 172 S model, for
example, has an equipment list which lists installed equipment from
the factory with it's weight and whether it is Required (by type
certificate), Standard (installed by factory) or Optional (owner
request, wheel pants for example).
Peter Clark
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Peter Clark
Find all threads started by Peter Clark