On Feb 26, 9:59 am, " wrote:
On Feb 26, 12:39 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:



Not really WW1 and 2 were sissy fights, historically
serious war is totally genocidal.

50+ Million killed over 8 years is a "sissy fight"?

It's a matter of proportion, try to keep a global
perspective, eg. Spanish Flu killed more than
WW1 did, something few know about.
Entire races were wiped out in the past, 99%.

So according to you, a war is "sissy" if the 'entire race" wasn't
wiped out.

POW's where taken in WW1&2, but historically, the
captive soldiers had genitals removed, salted and shipped
back for consumption, and the rest slaughtered or
enslaved.

Hunh? Which? SimCity?

No, the sims were automated.

Well, there you go. Who can gainsay such compelling evidence! They
were AUTOMATED!

The "automation" removes contamination.
It's rather like growing bacteria on a Petri dish.
One merely introduces various bacteria on to
the dish with variables in it's reproduction habits,
and statistically determines the winner.
It's bit more complex, but you get the picture.

I can now tell I likely more "well read" than you,
and with far better comprehesion, your wasting.

Clearly, you're far more quote well read unquote than me.
It's undeniable. My comprehension (that's how it's spelled, FWIW) of
kook history and inane logic is clearly sub par, in comparison to your
demonstrated superiority.

Evidentally, you tend to name calling, that is an
inferior trait, in normal discourse.

LOL, I guess you'd bomb Sicily to attack organized crime.
Ever heard of NATO?

Dan

Regrads
Ken

Yes, I heard of NATO. Served in the US Army in support of NATO in
Germany.

Well then duh you should know the Afghan mission is
a NATO operation and entire force of NATO cannot get Bin
Lauden, so why do think the Taliban could, you're wasting?
Ken