On Feb 26, 2:43 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:

POW's where taken in WW1&2, but historically, the
captive soldiers had genitals removed, salted and shipped
back for consumption, and the rest slaughtered or
enslaved.

What does this have to do with your inane argument?

[Great. I'm going to keep this going. The more you reply the more you
remove any doubt....]


The "automation" removes contamination.
It's rather like growing bacteria on a Petri dish.
One merely introduces various bacteria on to
the dish with variables in it's reproduction habits,
and statistically determines the winner.
It's bit more complex, but you get the picture.

Thanks so much for deigning to descend to my level, just this once.

As we pilots know, computer models never lie.


Clearly, you're far more quote well read unquote than me.
It's undeniable. My comprehension (that's how it's spelled, FWIW) of
kook history and inane logic is clearly sub par, in comparison to your
demonstrated superiority.

Evidentally, you tend to name calling, that is an
inferior trait, in normal discourse.

No, if I were name calling I would have said you were a "blathering
idiot" or "moron" or "oxygen thief."

I'm sure you've heard others reply with far, far better names.

Yes, I heard of NATO. Served in the US Army in support of NATO in
Germany.

Well then duh you should know the Afghan mission is
a NATO operation and entire force of NATO cannot get Bin
Lauden, so why do think the Taliban could, you're wasting?

The Taliban had no incentive to "get Bin Laden." They harbored and
supported him and his malevolent cronies.

Maybe you were asleep, but NATO took over *after* the US dismantled
the Taliban.

Now, have you taken this afternoon's dose or are you waiting for the
shakes to get worse?


Dan

"I do my killin before breakfast..."