View Single Post
  #1  
Old February 27th 08, 08:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 302
Default The Angry White Man

On Feb 27, 2:45 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
I haven't flown a 172 that I would want to fly any length of time in
IMC -- you're in it too long as you're so slow, the big wing catches
every bump, and the climb performance is anemic (unless you have the
180 HP conversion).


Flown smaller and slower than that IMC! you get used to it..

Bertie

Now what would that be?? A Tri-Pacer?

Not much slower that's IMC-capable than a 172 with a whopping 105 TAS.

:-)

Dan