Alan Minyard wrote in
:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 23:17:34 GMT, "Bjørnar Bolsøy"
wrote:
Alan Minyard wrote in
m:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 01:09:56 GMT, "Bjørnar Bolsøy"
wrote:
Which particular european nations and medical care system
are you refering to?
Regards...
All of them. They are decades behind the US Medical Care
system.
Well, how exactly?
Regards...
They do not have the requisite number of MRIs CTs etc.
They do not have adequate ambulance services (I am
talking about the equipment, not the Paramedics). They
still have hospitals with open wards (nearly all of the
hospitals in the US are private rooms only).
Are these personal assertions, or what sources you
base these numbers on? What does this say about
a countrys health service in general? There are
other factors involved.
It is a matter of
adequate resources, research, surgical techniques etc. It is not
an accident the twins co-joined at the head/brain come
to the US from all over the world to be separated (at
no cost to the parents).
Al Minyard
Well, I guess some of this is true, but Europe is about
40 nations with a great deal of variation in both
quality, high-tech gadgetory and service. It seems to
me you treat Europe as a one common unity, which to
me seems at least as silly (pardon the french) as treating
the US as one great state with common laws and practise.
Many European countries have a fully modern health service,
not at least free medical care for everyone (like here
in Norway).
Regards...
|