View Single Post
  #61  
Old March 8th 08, 08:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.piloting
cavelamb himself[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 474
Default A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven


Appreciate the comment. If certification has value, why does this put him
in unfair competition?




Because it takes time and money.



Replying to myself (because it's late)...


Ok first:

Certifications says that the airplane meets minimum standards for
controlability and performance. That is not the case with X-AB.

The airplane can be manufactured in quanity and sold freely.
But the design is then frozen.
No changes are allowed without recertification.

Experimental amateur built allows you to build an airplane for your own
education and recreation.

It does not have to meet FAA standards of any kind.

Usually the neophyte builder has some tool skills - but no where near
what he (or she!) will have when finished.
That's part of the education part.

But one who says he can't - before trying - is usually right.


Second:

Fiberglass is laid, not flipped.
And dog gone near anybody can learn to do it.
It's not magic.
Just messy.


And Lastly:

I humbly suggest that if you are going to come in here with that handle,
you need to make a much more active effort at educating yourself.

This is a very technical forum.

And there are some very talented and knowledgable people who hang here.

They mostly don't care for trolls.

For what it's worth...

Richard