On Mar 8, 2:48 pm, "Dan Luke" wrote:
"John T" wrote:
http://www.sourcewatch.org
http://www.realclimate.org

Not examples of balanced or un-biased sites. These don't help you any more
than usinghttp://junkscience.comwould help me convince you of the fallacy
of your belief in AGW.

Invalid comparison.

junkscience is run by a lobbyist with a documented history of creating
disinformation in the service of tobacco, chemical and oil corporations.
Although Milloy frequently represents himself as an expert on scientific
matters, he is not a scientist himself. He has never published original
research in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

You may disagree with the scientists on RealClimate, but their reputations in
their profession are intact despite years of slander (against Mann, in
particular) by people like Milloy.

I'm learning more -- such as -- your guys are pure, unsullied by
interests, while anyone who dares proffer contrary data must be a
minion of the evil capitalists...

I admire your expertise in the resorting to the ad hominem argument.

OK, done for now. heading outside to chop down a tree and burn it for
heat.

Dan