Dan wrote in
:

On Mar 8, 2:48 pm, "Dan Luke" wrote:
"John T" wrote:
http://www.sourcewatch.org
http://www.realclimate.org

Not examples of balanced or un-biased sites. These don't help you
any more than usinghttp://junkscience.comwould help me convince you
of the fallacy of your belief in AGW.

Invalid comparison.

junkscience is run by a lobbyist with a documented history of
creating disinformation in the service of tobacco, chemical and oil
corporations. Although Milloy frequently represents himself as an
expert on scientific matters, he is not a scientist himself. He has
never published original research in peer-reviewed scientific
journals.

You may disagree with the scientists on RealClimate, but their
reputations in their profession are intact despite years of slander
(against Mann, in particular) by people like Milloy.

I'm learning more -- such as -- your guys are pure, unsullied by
interests, while anyone who dares proffer contrary data must be a
minion of the evil capitalists...

IOW, you have no interest in learning anything but how to reinforce your
postition.


I admire your expertise in the resorting to the ad hominem argument.

Bull****.

OK, done for now. heading outside to chop down a tree and burn it for
heat.


Which will grow a new tree in time.
Good start..



Bertie