Dan wrote in
:

On Mar 9, 2:21 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dan wrote
innews:85a42407-674c-4cca-811f-09df90a0f7cb@
2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com
:



On Mar 9, 1:48 pm, "Dan Luke" wrote:
"Dan" wrote:
So, only 1,400 signatories even *claimed* to have anything to
do with climate
science. And out of that 1,400, two hundred were climate
researchers.

That's a long way from 19,000 scientists who doubt that AGW is
real, isn't it?

You won't listen to "climate researchers" unless they abide by
your hysteria.

You haven't got any climate researchers. If you did, you could
post links to their peer-reviewed research.

You got suckered by a bogus petition. Because you wanted to

I gotta go shovel the snow caused by all this global warming.

You don't even know what it means.

Don't strain your back.

You know, your kind has been around a while. In the 80's it was the
anti-nuke crowd. Same look, same methods, same chicken little
tactics, same "concerned scientists," same power grab, same
celebrity hand- wringing ("I Hope the Russians Love their children
too.."), same name- calling, same phony-baloney cooked up numbers.

So, you're saying a nuclear conflict would have been no big deal?

And "your kind?"

Good grief.

Bertie

We all knew the conflict would be catastrophic.

However, the Anti-nuke crowd wanted the US to disarm unilaterally.
They also insisted that it was US technical advances and weapon
fielding that was destabilizing.

It was.

To the Soviet Empire.

And yeah, his "kind." The insulting, name calling, rude, and obnoxious
"kind."

I know what you mean.

Anyone who takes a certain point of view must be a name-calling rude and
obnoxious "kind".





Bertie