On Mar 10, 3:10 pm, "Dan Luke" wrote:

Speaking of inconsistency...


To which I replied:

"So a 20-foot sea level rise over a couple hundred years would be just an
inconvenience. Right."

[blah blah blah snipped]

However, very recently you said: "By the way, neither I nor anyone
else predicts a 20-ft sea level rise by 2100. That's all in your
head. You're delusional."

So which is it? 20' rise or not?

Oh -- another recourse of the alarmists, to wit "It's not linear."

Thus, there is no point in time which we can examine the claims and
see if there if progression towards the ultimate hypothesis or away
from it, proving or disproving thier claims.

How very convenient.

Actually, I'll keep it up so you continue to expose yourself as a
zealot.


Dan