http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm

I didn't see a whole lot of interest above. I'm amazed at the
rationalizations some so-called scientists will stoop to in an effort to
support a faulty hypothesis.

Was there some specific criticism you had?


http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=13

There is much more evidence that warming causes high CO2 levels than there
is for the converse, yet the rationalizations continue.

Let's hear it.