On Mar 17, 7:32*pm, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article ,
*WJRFlyBoy wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:00:14 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:
*I develop real estate with a slant to the niche, luxury market place
(beach, bay, waterfront at the present.) In my area of SW FL, there is
only one airpark and, imo, it's not up to what folks want.
The picture that I am getting is that "WJRFlyBoy" has a vested interest
in shutting down the airpark at North Captiva. Just how many new
(expe$sive) home$ can he build there if he can force the place to close?
None would be my answer. The last thing I would want is to
1) have my named attached to a closing then
2) Have my name attached to a new development.
3) Raise public (incorrect) perceptions to the safety issues
4) Have my name attached to a new development.
In a previous posting I recited one of my criteria for an airpark place
to live: "Big enough to defend itself when the Philistines attack." *Is
"WJRFlyBoy" one of those Philistines?
lol
North Captiva is small, apparently with only 20-30 homes there.
Many more than that.
The
residents would have to shell out a lot of money in lawyers' fees if
somebody mounted a strong movement against them.
They got it, I doubt there are any homes under $1M
The Chicken Littles
would pour out of the woodwork, crying "The sky is FALLING!" In steps
Mr. Foxy Loxy, promising to develop houses on the site, if only they can
get rid of those pesky, dangerous airplanes.
So much for the above, Orval.
If you are telling the truth, please accept my apologies.
I have seen too many airport battles where developers have stirred
things up withthe "natives" in order to destroy airports in the name of
"safety."
--
Remove _'s *from email address to talk to me.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Telling the truth....don't think he has a clue about what the truth
is. Showed up on the student pilot group back in November wanting
information of taking lessons. Then he claims several hundred hours
in the "left" seat. Turns out that he still hasn't started taking
lessons much less having time as PIC in any seat. See one of his
posts from Feb 28 below.
================================================== =========
1. WJRFlyBoy View profile
More options Feb 28, 4:11 am
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.student, rec.aviation.piloting
From: WJRFlyBoy
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:11:04 -0500
Local: Thurs, Feb 28 2008 4:11 am
Subject: The Differences Between PPLicensing And Learning
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
I have been reading the various threads about spins, forced landings,
etc
and talking with CFIs. The road to a PPL is preset in requirements by
FAA.
I see that most people are happy to do nothing more than that.
Outside
of
the cost factors, I find this much more than curious considering the
consequences. You can get killed, that one keeps jumping out at me
I am asking the group for assistance in developing a list of
instructional
and solo experiences, testing, mandatory reading.....if you ran the
FAA,
what would you require in a near-perfect world that a PPL would
require? I
am a zero-hour wannabe pilot FYI
For a start, I won't begin my first instruction until I can do the
following:
Pass all tests with a 95% minimum
Handle with ease all traffic control and similar commo
Dissect the anatomy of my training aircraft
Understand what and how the instrumentation works (shortcomings
included)
Own all the fundamentally necessary flight gear (i.e carry-ons in
flight
bag or on person)
Obtain hours in flight simulation
More...enough for now.
TIA. The group is an extremely valuable resource; I sincerely doubt I
would
be so focused and confident without your past, present and future
work
here.
--
================================================== ======