View Single Post
  #4  
Old March 20th 08, 02:35 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
WJRFlyBoy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 531
Default Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path?

On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:07:25 -0700, gatt wrote:

"WJRFlyBoy" wrote in message
...

Then let me step up and tell you that land developers, a community in
which I muck around in, is full of swarthy corporations and individuals
who could care less about the environmental issue /other/ than how to
get around them. In FL, there are loopholes all over the place. How do I
know? Because we have formed our own ecoscience group to deal with the
Army Corp, the water districts, the DEP, NOAA, USWLF, ad infinitum.


Sounds great!

We hold accountability to our processes. Airparks appear to be a
possible development area where we can apply that accountability and
have potential for profits.


Hmm. Well, best of luck with that. I've lived under one traffic pattern
or another pretty much all my life and I haven't gotten tired of it yet!

-c


Thanks. Environmental accountability, FYI, doesn't include traffic
patterns in the sense that I meant it. More about wetlands, mitigations,
etc.
--
Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either!
I hesitate to add to this discussion because I'm not an instructor,
just a rather slow student who's not qualified to give advice that
might kill someone.