noel.wade wrote:
Hi All,

Back at the beginning of the year, I anticipated being able to upgrade
my glider. I bought my Russia AC-4a in 2007 on a very limited budget
and have thoroughly enjoyed its sprightly handling, easy rigging, and
climb capability. However, a big jump in my position at work has
given the the means to afford a better glider. Since my job also
means I may fly less often, I want a ship that I can stretch out with
more on longer glides (here in Seattle we get a lot of days with
3,000' - 4,000' cloudbases and only 2 - 3 knots of lift. I'm thinking
that 38:1 *measured* is the minimal L/D I'll be interested in).

Initially I was thinking I'd have a $25k - $30k limit and probably try
something with flaps (a la LS-3, Mini-Nimbus, Mosquito, DG-200, etc).
There was a long thread here where people provided some great advice.

Recently its begun looking like I may actually be able to afford a
$35k - $40k glider. This price-range opens up a few new doors
(ASW-20, perhaps a DG-202 or maybe DG-300, LS-4 mayyyybe, Pegasus, or
others?)... I was wondering if folks would be willing to tell me
their pick, and state why.

Priorities: I am interested in good ergonomics (the Apises and
DG-300's at our airfield make me envious), good/responsive handling,
good performance in weak weather, good visibility (one piece canopy),
and easy rigging (automatic hookups preferred - for safety as well as
rigging convenience).

Obviously PU or good Gel-Coat and a good trailer are important; but
what I'm after here are the inherent traits of the glider model you
suggest.

Thanks a bunch in advance!


Ventus b *used* to be in your price range, especially if the panel is dated.
Great landing characteristics, long gliding legs, light(er) all carbon
wings, easy rigging, and all auto control connections. Most people
describe the cockpit as roomy. At 5'7" I'm not a good judge though.

Shawn