View Single Post
  #106  
Old April 2nd 08, 05:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
WJRFlyBoy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 531
Default Cirrus Owner Tell His Story

On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 07:01:59 -0400, Kyle Boatright wrote:

"WJRFlyBoy" wrote in message
...
On 1 Apr 2008 14:53:01 -0700, ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:

What your not
getting is that there is reality and perception, zooms trying to create
the
perception that if you go to SnF you'll get taxed when the reality is a
lot
different


I have shown several times and in several posts that Florida has the
legal, statutory right to tax your plane under the conditions outlined
in this thread. That they have taken exactly that action.

I simply do not understand why it is that you can't get this concept
through your head.


There is a very limited set of circumstances in which Florida will tax an
aircraft. The ANN articles implied that the circumstances are far broader
than they are in reality. Typical of the annual "Torpedo SnF " hatchet job
articles, the story in ANN didn't have a byline, didn't offer enough facts
to paint the entire picture, and was timed to cause harm to SnF.

Other than that, it was a fine article.

KB


No disagreement with any of this, Kyle.