Well, Wikipedia may be a quick reference point, but, it has it's share of
errors, It's like saying the History Channel only shows true history. There
may be an attempt, but, I don't think either tries to prove or improve the
accuracy of whatever they are given to print or show. So, I wouldn't ever
use Wikipedia to win a bet, or prove a point.
Ron

"Alan Erskine" wrote in message
...
Seems I am the one who's wrong:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SR-71_B...nd_designation