On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:

Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
to what was said.


And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
should be deleted?

As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for the
exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.

Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides to
flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.


For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel
are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.

Yeah, like your crap article.

Our decision to
add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we
understand the situation completely.

"Our"? Oh please.


God, what a small world you live in.

Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as you
think you are.