On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:15:58 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:

Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
to what was said.


And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
should be deleted?

You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-)

Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
lessons in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements
like this one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the
person you're addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit of
issue over that run in we had a while back when I told you you were the
worst CFI I've ever encountered on Usenet. :-)

It doesn't matter really.

Oh, no. It doesn't matter at all. *make a thread asking for help tracing
the IP of the person who deleted my wiki page*


All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no longer
needed.
If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.

As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for
the exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with
Wikipedia.

Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides
to flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.

No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the forum
coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a hammer as
you have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki. To tell you
the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually forgotten the article
was there. You can verify that by searching for the last time I
mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly safe in telling you
that what you will find are very few if any times I have mentioned the
Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it first; which of course
shoots a rather large hole in your "self importance" theory.

It doesn't matter how many times you have mentioned it in the last year,
the point id you wrote your own damn wikipedia article. I find it funny
how you repeatedly can't grasp why this is so humorous to people my me
and apparently mxsmanic who see you as nothing but a parody of the kind
of person you claim to be.

It's especially funny because the article reads exactly like your posts
here. Nothing but half-assed claims of notoriety alongside substance-less
fluff all wrapped up in image-conscious tone.