Larry Dighera wrote:

On Sun, 04 May 2008 08:51:42 -0400, Bob Noel
wrote in
:

In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote:

Because it's so banal as to be irrelevant, and those who emphasize it
are seen to be spinmasters who are attempting to confuse the rubes
into taking their eye off the pea.

The point is that those most able to pay and who have reaped the most
from the system, the wealthiest 1% of tax payers, reaped a windfall as
a result of Bush's tax cut on dividend income.

It's your langauge that is that of a spinmaster, with inflammatory emotional
wording ("windfall", "rubes", "spinmaster").

So if you are incapable of rebutting my point, you attack my diction.
With all due respect, is that another pathetic attempt to dodge the
true issue, or merely the result your lack of insight?

I already gave the response.

A response perhaps, but not a rational refutation of my statement
based on logic.

It is difficult to be any more based on logic than simple arithmetic.

Mr. McNicoll so lacked the ability to articulate his
opposing view, that he was driven to invoke profanity in place of
logical argument; pathetic.

Your statement contains no logic. There was no profanity as you claim. I provided
many examples of logic that opposed your rants in other posts, you merely snipped
nearly all of the post and focused on one item at the bottom.



The people who pay taxes see benefit when taxes are cut. This isn't
spin, it's simple math.


While it may be mathematically accurate, it serves to conceal the
truth rather than expose it.

Fascinating "logic."



It appears that you want to turn this into some kind class war.

From that statement, I can only assume you choose to overlook that
aspect of the issue. That's not going to make it go away.

The only reason we are debating this issue is because it was one of
the examples of RNC anti-average-citizen measures I mentioned. When
this issue is viewed along side other anti-average-citizen measures
promulgated by RNC scalawags, such as the prohibition against Medicare
negotiating lower prices with pharmaceutical companies, failure to
repeal tax subsidies for oil companies that are reaping the largest
profits in history, etc., it becomes apparent that this administration
is very definitely indulging in a form of class warfare. To overlook
that is to attempt to obfuscate it.

Which special "tax subsidies" for "oil companies" are your referring to,
specifically? No obfuscations, please. Since all of your vitriol is targeted at
only RNC, which legislation to repair your supposed issue has been procreated by the
Democrat led Congress, or even signed by recent Democrat Presidents?

By the way, do you prefer more oil consumption, or less?