View Single Post
  #11  
Old May 4th 08, 09:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,735
Default Things I Would Like To See

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news_r_fairbairn-39EFE0.13522504052008@70-3-168-

216.area5.spcsdns.net
...
In article ,
"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote:


Ok, but how does the stabilized approached rob the student of that
knowledge?

Accepted traffic pattern and approach procedures do nothing to limit
an instructors ability to teach aircraft handling or dead stick
landings.

If they are not teaching such, they themselves are robbing the
student. It
has nothing to do with current landing procedures.


If a student is taught power-on approaches all the time, he won't
know how to approach an airport and do a power-off approach. I agree
that they are being robbed. In many cases, the instructors themselves
are simple regurgitating the same bad training that they themselves
received.


Ok, but how does the stabilized approached rob the student of that
knowledge?


Whoosh.


Bertie