Larry Dighera wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008 00:35:04 GMT, wrote in
:

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 09 May 2008 22:35:05 GMT, wrote in
:

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 09 May 2008 22:05:02 GMT, wrote in
:


In a war theater there is no
need for those sorts of safeguards, so training operations employing
hardware not designed for civil operation is inappropriate.

So there should be training bombers and war bombers, training tanks
and war tanks, training rifles and war rifles, training Humvees and
war Humvees...

No. If at all, there should be UAVs that are designed for domestic
operations during peacetime, instead of hardware designed for use in
war theaters being used domestically.

And what precisely would be the difference between a "peacetime" UAV
and a "war theater" UAV?


One would be designed to be safe for domestic operation over, and in
proximity to, the public; the other would be designed for its efficacy
in the war theater with public safeguard concerns subordinate..

Nice arm waving.

Now, what precisely would be the difference between a "peacetime" UAV
and a "war theater" UAV?

What design parameters would be different?

If you have nothing concrete in mind, you are just babbling.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.