on 5/19/2008, A Lieberman supposed :
On May 18, 10:42*pm, Gezellig wrote:
A Lieberman brought next idea :

The problem with feelings is that no two sets of feelers feel with the
same feeling. lol Then there are the sets of feelings that are felt
that are not consciously felt in terms of being able to explain them.

ABSOLUTELY AGREE. And when that happens, instruments MUST be
trusted.

It's the absence of an EXPECTED feeling that should question the
validity of instrumentation.

In my case, and SUDDEN extreme pitch up displayed on my AI, I should
have expected positive G's in the seat of my pants. I did not get
that, therefore me flagging the AI and starting my cross check to my
secondary instruments for troubleshooting.

Sensory inputs are checkpoints.

I see
I feel
I see
I see more
I resolve to what I see.

Basic piloting, best constrained and confirmed to the sciences of
engineering and physics. This is what I struggle the most, I am neither
physicist, mathmetician or engineering inclined. :-? I flunked Legos.
:')