"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in
:

Actually, I think it is those pilots who believe they know better
than the FAA, and deviate from FAA guidelines, or fail to appreciate
the wisdom inherent in the FARs who are operationally unfit to be
pilots.



Actually, it is the pilots who don't understand that rules are for the
guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools, to quote Douglass
Bader, that are a problem.


In the accident cited above, the Stinson pilot attempted to deviate
from 91.113(g).

You don't know that.
Fool.


That attempt to deviate from FAA regulations
resulted in his attempting to takeoff while another aircraft was on
final approach. If he had complied with 91.113(g), and waited for
the landing traffic, it would not have landed on top of him. Even
you, in your current mental state should be capable of seeing the
fundamental truth in that, hopefully.
Agreed Larry
Maybe I got lucky, but in my ground school
a controller came in and did a 1 hour lecture
and removed all ambiguity on radio com.
He stressed "clarity and brevity", and what he
needed to know, succintly.
Made complete common sense to me.


You're an idiot.

Clear and brief enough for you?


Bertie