"Le Chaud Lapin" wrote in message
...

Part of the problem with PAV is not that people do not want it, but no
one has made anything practical yet.

If someone were to make a PAV that satisfied the criteria outlined by
NASA/CAFE/PAV, there would be tremenous consumer response.

-Le Chaud Lapin-

Not from me; and from what I have read on this thread, the possible market
in this newsgroup can be counted on the fingers of one hand. Of that small
number, you would be the only one willing to spend money--presuming that you
are willing to do so.

Personally, for the foreseeable future and without any regard for which
costs more money or less, I will continue to be more satisfied with cables
and tie rods than with any plausible firmware and servo solution. The idea
of software on general purpose, or multipurpose, hardware is just too
dangerous to consider--having done a bit of professional maintenance on
workstations, including some on networks, I don't even want to be in the
same county!

Peter

BTW, this topic has been beaten to death multiple times over the last
decade. So, in the event that you are not just trolling, a little effort
with a search engine will yeild a lot of good information.