Future of Electronics In Aviation
In rec.aviation.piloting Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
On Jun 23, 10:36 am, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:
Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
Software doesn't make airplanes fly. And as I mentioned I think this is
your problem, you think it does. Might something be invented in the next
10 years that makes PAV an option? Sure, I have no idea what might be
invented in the next 10 years. Somebody might invent Mr. Fusion. What I
can guarantee is that no SOFTWARE is going to be written in the next 10
years or ever that is going to make current hardware able to fulfill
your idea of a PAV. There are a lot of very smart software people out
there and there are also a lot of folks who build homebuilt aircraft.
There is bound to be a subset in there of the two and none of them have
done it.
I have scoured the web for these homebuilt craft, and most of them
conform to the tractor model, which automatically precludes many
possibilities, even the ones with folding wings.
Yes most do because we have found that it is very efficient and safe.
But there are pushers out there as well.
I'll repeat there is no way SOFTWARE could make current technology do
what you want to do. If you think I'm wrong prove it. It is up to the
person making the wild ass claims to do so. Otherwise your are asking us
to prove a negative and we can't do that.
What do you mean by "current technology"?
Technology that is available today. Not warp drives or anti-matter power
sources.
Do you mean taking a standard aircraft or kit and adding software to
it? If so, I would agree that software will not help here. As
mentioned before, a $100,000 plane, it would be impossible to take
something that already costs $100,000 and add more to it and make it
cost less than $100,000.
No mean with the current technology there is no way to build what you
want to build.
The bottom of the line Cessna 172 costs $235k.
Assume $50k for the engine and controls.
Assume $40k for the avionics.
That leaves the airframe at $145k.
Composite airframes are just as expensive.
What are you going to build an airframe out of that significantly reduces
that cost, Chinese rice paper?
Lapin is a babbling idiot.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
|