Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

yeedyeegiiss wrote:

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

yeedyeegiiss wrote:

Ah, so the USSC is an insufficient authority to you, even though it
is charged with duties that include making legal decisions as to
what does and does not violate the US Constitution.


Where can that charge be found?

The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and
controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United
States. As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with
ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law
and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the
Constitution.
The rest is left as an exercise to the student.

The student is you.

No, the student isn't me. I know where the above quote can be found.

It is trivial to find it. Finding it will reveal the remainder of
the answer you seem to desperately seek.

Or do you not believe that the USC is "the highest tribunal in the
Nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or
the laws of the United States?" If so, what body would serve this
function?

I asked where that charge could be found, a proper
answer includes a location.

A proper answer includes "plug in the above quote to the appropriate
search tool, and go find it. The location is glaringly obvious."

Otherwise, you're just sinking to Anthony Atkielski's level of, um,
"argument."