August 5th 08, 02:51 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks
|
|
|
Things not to do while working on your private ticket...
buttman wrote in
:
On Aug 4, 10:17*pm, "Mike" wrote:
"Peter Dohm" wrote in message
...
"Mike" wrote in message
news gIlk.165$ZV1.149@trnddc07...
Taking off with your wife and daughter would have to be pretty
high on the list:
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20080731X01135
The plane was a '59 145hp 172. *DA would have been around 3,500. *
You can
draw your own conclusions.
Not much there to draw any conclusion from, beyond the assertion
about
the
certificate issue. *There was plenty of *runway for the conditions;
so if
the fuel was good, the prop was not repitched for some special
purpose, and the engine continued to run correctly we would all
have none the wiser.
And yes, am familiar with the model and vintage, although not the
same tail number.
Actually there's quite a bit. *The plane appears to have been
transferr
ed in
2004, so it's reasonable to assume the new owner (who at one time was
iss
ued
a student certificate) had attempted to gain a PP-SEL and never
completed
.
If you want to go down the road of conjecture, someone who has such a
blatant disregard for the FAR possibly didn't have a current annual
on th
e
plane either and possibly wasn't worried too much about weight and
balanc
e,
density altitude, or any other pesky little detail.
he also probably raped his daughter and also most likely murdered a
few people as well. Because when you show willingness to break one
rule, there is no limit of what you're capable of, right?
PKB
Bertie
|