Clark wrote in
:

More_Flaps wrote in
news:7fa28711-ed56-49c3-bcd5-
:

On Aug 6, 8:41*am, wrote:
On Aug 5, 4:13*pm, More_Flaps wrote:



On Aug 6, 6:31*am, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote: Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Gig 601Xl Builder wrote in
news:66-

Other than it was the final outcome of a flight that in
itself
wou
ld
violation of the child endangerment laws of most states? Not
much.

you dont know that.

Your name Lynch, by any chance?

What don't I know? There is little doubt that the flight ended
in an accident.

I note you say accident not incident. What you don't know is if he
was a skilled pilot and the extent to which improper operation
contributed to the incident. He didn't stall but carried out a
controlled crash landing apparently. Not a bad outcome for engine
loss over a wooded area -suggesting some skill doncha think?

Cheers

It's hard to argue with the fact that the crash was a success. The
question is would it have been more likely avoided had the PIC
undergone PPL training.

He must have had PPL training. He did not take a flight test tho' and
I'm not sure a PPL would have stopped an engine failure (even icing
induced?).
Icing on departure? Ummm, itsn't that the least likely case?




Nope, not with an O 300. The report will tel.

Bertie