On 13 Aug, 12:13, Clark wrote:
Venik wrote in news:-
:

Clark wrote:
Venik wrote in
om:

150flivver wrote:
SU-24 = F-111 wannabe
That's why F-111 is still in service and Su-24 has been long-retired.
Oh, wait a minute...

You do realize the F-111 is still in service...

So is MiG-17. That's not the point.

Let's see here now, you tried to imply that the F-111 isn't in service and
then say the fact that it's still in service isn't the point. Perhaps you
should attempt to clarify your argument. I'd suggest that you try to make a
rational point rather than a self-conflicted point.

--
---
there should be a "sig" here

Venik hasn't a clue about military aircraft. He freely admitted that
back in 1999 with his rants on NATO losses.

Check out his mindset when trying to justify to himself and convince
others about huge NATO losses.

Really worth a read if you want a laugh.

http://www.aeronautics.ru/natodownfaq.htm

TJ