Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"Jim Logajan" wrote in message
.. .


If you stay here, it's moderated by Bertie, Dudley and their ilk.

Well - not really moderated except in one's own head. At least that
is the way I see it.

At least Jim is an agreeable fellow with humble motives.

First, thank you for that compliment. I do appreciate it.

Second, I'm afraid I mist tell you that I rather like Dudley - even
when I don't always agree with him. As a less than perfect human, I
am very averse
to disliking people just because they have faults.

Lastly, I'm not all that humble, I'm afraid. Just not accomplished
enough to trumpet my greatness. ;-)

I just suggested you might make a reasonable moderator.

I never meant to indicate you were a good judge of character, or had a
clue what was going on around here.


Snort!

Here's the clue I have so you both know precisely where I stand:

When "Bertie" cross-posts to the groups he does, then he exhibits the same
level of morality of a person who would flash a strobe light in the eyes of
a epileptic: for the simple pleasure of seeing that person convulse in an
epileptic seizure. He knows that there is no "learning" or "unlearning"
involved. He claims as much. He knows that it wont change things - he does
it for the sake of doing it.

When "Maxwell" continues to claim "Bertie" is responsible for "forging" his
name to posts, he is relying only on motivation - nothing more. There
exists other immoral (or amoral or simply immature) people in abundance who
are more than likely responsible.

I feel sad for both of you because neither of you seem to have a real clue
to what is really important. If you did, neither of you would find
yourselves in the online positions you now inhabit.