Peter Hucker wrote:

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:39:47 +0100, ®i©ardo wrote:



Peter Hucker wrote:



On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:38:41 +0100, ®i©ardo wrote:



Peter Hucker wrote:



On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:00:15 GMT, "Alan Erskine" wrote:



"Peter Hucker" wrote in message ...



When he initially asked, the first five responses were yes.



The first five; from then on, it was all people who didn't want J3 to post in anything other than the normal formats for this group.



Then they shouldn't take so bloody long to reply. Anyway, if 5 people (at least) want them, it doesn't matter how many don't.



Democracy takes on a whole new meaning.



So a TV channel shouldn't air anything unless more than 50% of people want to see it?



This is not a TV channel. If you're happy that the tail wags the dog, so be it.



What makes you think each post has to be wanted by most of the group? I doubt that is true of ANY post in here.

You are comparing apples and oranges here. There is a big difference between a "few" photos and a flood of photos.
There were other newsgroup options available that would have been on-topic.
An almost disused newsgroup such as alt.binaries.pictures.misc would have been the perfect solution.
But what transpired was selfishness and I'll post them here, because I can and screw everyone else.
So I guess just for spite there will be more of this nonsense. The highland laddie will be at the top sining, I have "six month retention" so screw you all.
These guys never learned how to play in the sandbox. And will never learn. Good luck to them. What goes around comes around.....I can wait until sand gets kicked in their face...

Attached Thumbnails