In article YNfsk.641$w51.45@trnddc01, "Mike" wrote:

"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article LSesk.685$lf2.108@trnddc07, "Mike"
wrote:

There was no perjury.

He lied under oath. That, by definition, is perjury.

No it's not.

'The offense of willfulling telling an untruth in a court after
having taken an oath or affirmation."


However your definition does demonstrate why you don't posses the knowledge
to argue such points.

Isn't my defintion.

Clinton was never convicted or even so much as
indicted for any such crime, or any other crime for that matter.

which does not mean he didn't lie.

It means he's innocent of perjury.

Presumed innocent by the legal system.


If you're
not familiar with the facts of the situation, you should better educate
yourself before you comment.

indeed.

Glad you agree.

If only others would educate themselves...

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)