"Mike" wrote in news:eqmsk.717$lf2.208@trnddc07:

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news%lsk.257419$TT4.108517@attbi_s22...
Cheating on Hillary was never the offense. Using the power of his
position to gain sexual favors from an employee *was*. Having sex
was never the offense, despite how desperately the Left has tried
to make it the salient point of the discussion.

You're kidding right? Do you honestly believe Clinton coerced the
chubby intern?

Sure do -- especially since the only other alternative is that she
was attracted to the old man.

Not only was she attracted to him, she was infatuated with him. Your
ignorance of the details is really showing.


Bottom line: Abusing power by coercing sex from/with an employee,
during business hours, on government property, is generally
considered to be illegal, as can be readily proven by the number of
"public servants" who are currently doing time right now for similar
crimes. Therefore -- unless you're suggesting that we hold the
president to a lower standard than we do our mayors or high school
principals -- I think the entire framework of your argument is as
specious as Clinton's claims that he "did not have sex with that
woman."

First of all, what you describe never happened. Lewinsky was never
coerced. If you believe she was, you should better educate yourself as
you are taking ignorance to a fine art form.


Why should he break th ehabits of a lifetime?


Bertie