"FREEDOM-OF-SPEECH" wrote in message
...
Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
Mike wrote:

There was no perjury. Clinton was never convicted or even so much as
indicted for any such crime, or any other crime for that matter. If
you're not familiar with the facts of the situation, you should better
educate yourself before you comment.


To say he wasn't indicted is somewhat misleading. He was never indicted
because you can't indict a sitting President or Vice President. The vote
by the house to impeach was the indictment. To think that Starr couldn't
have taken what he had and gotten an indictment from any grand jury in
the land shows a huge level of misunderstanding how grand juries work. As
has been said a good prosecutor could indict a ham sandwich. Getting a
conviction is another thing entirely. I remember when either the Starr
Report was published. I read through and there was one place where a
crime had clearly been committed and where there should have been a
conviction. There was testimony from Clinton's secretary that Clinton
told her to lie to the grand jury and it was very specific.


First Mike defends FAA Management goons while belittling the FAA workers
who keep those tubes of people from becoming a pink mist and THEN he
defends Bill Clinton!?!?!?!?

You're an idiot.


Fess up Mike are you a closet Weenie Puffer??
San FAGcisco Rump Ranger perhaps??
Fess up boy

Are you looking for a date?

Freud said hostility towards homosexuality is simply a defense mechanism
against the subject's own homosexual desires.

It's amazing how much you reveal about yourself, isn't it, GW?