"Mike" wrote in newspWsk.848$lf2.535@trnddc07:

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
"Mike" wrote in news:GOVsk.866$w51.653
@trnddc01:

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:lVKsk.314241$yE1.254747@attbi_s21...
Gosh, you are a singularly unpleasant twit, aren't you?

So it's OK for you to analize what I believe, but you can't handle
reciprocation? One of the concepts I learned as a young lad was,
"don't dish it out if you can't take it." You would do well to
learn that lesson, especially since you have a tough time facing
the
truth. Furthermore I never engaged in name calling, so try taking
a
good hard look in the mirror sometime. You might be surprised at
what you find.

I've seen reading comprehension problems here before, but it's not
normally associated with what you, yourself, wrote. Let's see:
You
didn't engage in "name calling" when you accused me of "rampant
stupidity" (to quote one of your milder dings)? Somehow your
definition of name calling seems to differ from mine -- as if
that's
a surprise, coming from someone who can't understand that lying
under
oath is wrong.

I simply suggested a reason why you keep repeating the same nonsense
over and over despite being told otherwise. A google search on
Lewinsky+infatuation yields over 19,000 results and I can only
assume
you're smart enough to do that. If I'm mistaken, let me know and
I'll
provide more assistance, or if you have another explanation I'd be
glad to hear it. Furthermore, I clearly explained I was leaning
towards another explanation and I was only referencing only one
aspect
of your replies, not you as a whole. Any slight you may have felt
was
richly deserved.

English is a wonderful language. You should learn how to use it.

Next, I never claimed lying under oath wasn't wrong, so why do you
feel the need to lie? Are you really that desperate to try and
convince yourself you're right?

It's always sad to see someone who held such fleeting promise
resort
to personal attacks when their logical house of cards collapses.
Fleeing the field when you can no longer play is so...Bertie-ish.
Hmmm... Could you be....? Nah.

Please, you were making personal attacks several steps up the thread
before I ever described your behavior. If you truly believe this
your
argument fell apart quite some time ago and that's giving you the
benefit of the doubt that you had one to begin with. Again I'll
suggest you go find a mirror.


Sorry -- "singularly unpleasant" is about as good as it's going to
get for you, I'm afraid. And "twit" is just too polite.

You have me confused with someone who really cares what you think of
me. From the pictures on your web site you run a 3rd rate hotel(at
best) that's obviously seen better days, and since you'd rather
fiddle
with a GPS than spend time flying an airplane I can only guess your
flying skills rate about the same. So why should I or anyone else
care about your grade school insults?



??You don;'t think they're a hoot?

They make pulling his chain worthwhile.



ah, you had me worried there.

Bertie