"Mike" wrote in message
news:M_Tuk.210$jE1.197@trnddc03...

Nice meaningless diatribe you have going on there.

Trying to relate on your level Mikey Mouth.

The best you can come up
with is YOU think Clinton committed perjury, which is clearly your
opinion. And still not one of you who believes Clinton committed perjury
can come up with any sort of reasonable explanation as to why he was never
so much as indicted for that crime.

Politics dumb ass. It's be like asking you to roll over on Bertie.



The question was whether Clinton committed the crime of perjury or not.
The USSC says factually correct but misleading answers do not amount to
perjury.

As the USSC is the supreme arbiter of the land, their opinions are what
matters, not yours.

No dumb ass, the opinion that ultimately counts is the voters.