"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in message
...

"Mike" wrote in message
...
"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in message
...

"Mike" wrote in message
...
"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in message
...

"Jim Logajan" wrote in message
...
"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote:
"Mike" wrote in message
news:X9Zwk.769$sq3.59@trnddc07...

Socken and sucken up to Mx now, eh Mikey Mouth.

You are either using a definition of "sock puppet" that only you
understand, or you don't understand the term as other people use it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_sock_puppet

The term sock puppet has been around much longer than the internet.

My first recollection of it was studying political history in the 9th
grade ('60s), but I have heard it used even more often in corporate
environments since. In either case it is used to indicate someone is
parroting someone else's believes or ideals.

Prove it.

Hell no

I knew you couldn't.

Another Anthony trim. Good job. Just shows, like Anthony, you have no
interest in someone else's opinion. But hell, we already knew that, didn't
we Mikey Mouth.

Referring to yourself as "we" now I see, Okie. Not only do your sockpuppets
have distinct nyms but apparently are assigned dissociative identities as
well. The extent of your delusions is much worse than I originally thought,
but please don't seek professional help. The entertainment value alone is
well worth it.

But to answer your (their?) assertion, I do indeed have interest in other
opinions, but yours (theirs) rate somewhere below Gary the Retard's.