On Sep 11, 6:08*am, Michael Huber wrote:
Sam Spade wrote:
The guy just plain ****es me off.

If you want to ignore him, ignore him. If you want to argue his points,
argue his points. But blanket ad hominem attacks are IMO neither
constructive nor conducive to a pleasant atmosphere in this newsgroup.
Furthermore, at least for me, it makes it harder ignore MXS if I choose to
do so because while he is in fact in my killfile, you aren't, and I see
your replies to his posts.

So please, in the interest of an improved SNR here, just ignore him if you
don't want to argue with him.

Agreed.

There should be more than enough history built up at this point that
anyone can find, to realize that there's no value being added. New
readers that don't do due diligence on this (or any) group get what
they deserve by jumping into the deep end. The vets already understand
the game of self-inflation being played, so why provide a right hand
for rosey to use?