"Mike Marron" wrote in message
...

As usual, you're talking out your ass again, Stevie. A transponder
is not required on the replica because the replica wasn't certificated
with an engine-driven electrical system.


I just posted a message in which I said you are an incredibly stupid person.
Thank you for proving that point for me, I wouldn't want anyone to accuse me
of name-calling.

Being a replica has nothing to do with the need for a transponder and
encoder. Replica aircraft certificated with engine-driven electrical
systems require transponders and encoders just as non-replica aircraft
certificated with engine-driven electrical systems do. Replica aircraft not
certificated with engine-driven electrical systems have the same exemptions
regarding transponders and encoders that non-replica aircraft not
certificated with engine-driven electrical systems have.

The attempted recreation took place in Class G airspace. No aircraft,
replica or non-replica, engine-driven electrical system or not, is required
to have a transponder and encoder to operate in Class G airspace below
10,000 MSL more than 30 miles from an airport listed appendix D, section 1
of Part 91.

Now, being the "expert" on the FARs that you are, tell me what Part this
replica was certificated under.



In the future, please don't
attempt to read the FARS unless you have a CFI like myself nearby
or some other knowledgable person who can explain this stuff to ya,
OK?


A CFI like yourself, if you are a CFI (doubtful), is not in a position to
explain the FARs to anyone.