On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 23:55:08 GMT, Fred J. McCall wrote:
(phil hunt) wrote:
:On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:43:49 -0500, Ray Drouillard wrote:
:
:Also, since it's not encrypted, it can be spoofed using a local
:transmitter
:
:That doesn't logically follow; it's possible to make non-encrypted
:data that can't be faked, you just use a digital signature.
But the 'digital signature' is really just another encryption
algorithm, typically more easily faked or broken than full encryption.
*plonk*
--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(Email: , but first subtract 275 and reverse
the last two letters).
|