View Single Post
  #48  
Old December 22nd 03, 02:42 AM
Tank Fixer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , RogerM
says...


None wrote:


I laugh at your nonsense. Just because a so called lease exists doesn't
mean the U.S. government can lay claim to the lands and tenements of another
country. Whether or not the Gitmo irritates Castro or not, the land still
belongs to Cuba and if they want to break the lease, they can. You seem to
be implying that U.S. law extends to Cuba, I assure you, it does not. If
the lease calls for payment in gold, and the U.S. sends a check, then they
are, and have been in breach of contract for years and rightfully, Cuba
could easily evict them and abandon the "lease".


How, exactly could Cuba enforce that eviction notice?


Stomp their feet and pout.



--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.