"Maxwell" #$$9#@%%%.^^^ wrote in
:


"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
news:bab4ac56-0218-4a5f-8814-11d455fd66b1
@g17g2000prg.googlegroups.com.
.. On Nov 16, 6:54 am, More_Flaps wrote:
On Nov 16, 2:08 pm, Bear Bottoms wrote:



On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:34:08 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
LOL! The Great Warrior Dudley Dewright Henriques, now talking
troll. Query this.

A canard wing and a main wing (on a Cozy IV) reverse the rules
of decolage (compared to a Cessna 150x). Yes?
--
Bear Bottoms
website:http://bearware.com

If you are asking me if the angles of incidence between the tail
and wing combination and canard and wing combination on the Cozy
are different on each type I'll refer you to Nat Puffer.

I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as
they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of
decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?

Is the question about aerodynamic or geoemetric decalage?

LOL

Cheers

Believe it or not it's a viable question as he asked it. I just don't
like the way it was asked :-))
Dudley

--------------------------------

You don't like the way anyone does anything, unless they kiss your ass
first.


You can kiss mine, i'm out of TP and i don't want to ruin my new tighty
whiteys



Bertie